Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

replaycodi/replay-worker

https://github.com/replaycodi/replay-worker · scanned 2026-06-15 23:50 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

387 raw signals (4 security + 383 graph)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 365 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 24 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 8 findings
What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.
Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.
How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.
Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.
8 matching findings on this repo
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 6 places repo-level
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 28 places
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 5 places
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 65 places
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 9 places repo-level
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 18 places
View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →
Legacy markers 3 findings
What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.
Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.
How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.
Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.
3 matching findings on this repo
  • medium Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in deploy/legacy-archive/caddie.… deploy/legacy-archive/caddie.html:3266
  • medium Insecure pattern 'direct_outerhtml_assignment' in deploy/legacy-archive/caddie.… deploy/legacy-archive/caddie.html:4007
  • medium Insecure pattern 'insert_adjacent_html' in deploy/legacy-archive/caddie.html:42… deploy/legacy-archive/caddie.html:4201
View all legacy markers findings →
Commented-out code 24 findings
What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.
Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.
How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.
Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.
12 matching findings on this repo
  • info Commented-code block (6 lines) in models.py:1046
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in deploy/functions/profile-tour-v2.js:4
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in deploy/functions/profile-tour.js:5
  • info Commented-code block (6 lines) in deploy/functions/[id].js:3
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in deploy/functions/caddie-v2.js:9
  • info Commented-code block (6 lines) in deploy/functions/_csp.js:12
  • info Commented-code block (7 lines) in deploy/functions/j/[code].js:3
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in deploy/functions/api/download-video.js:16
  • info Commented-code block (7 lines) in deploy/functions/s/[token].js:6
  • info Commented-code block (10 lines) in deploy/shared/markers.js:66
  • info Commented-code block (7 lines) in deploy/shared/auth-core.js:243
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in deploy/shared/grid-view.js:257
View all commented-out code findings →
Config drift 2 findings
What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.
Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.
How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.
Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.
2 matching findings on this repo
  • high Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: gpu-worker/CLAUDE.md gpu-worker/CLAUDE.md:35
  • high Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: .claude/projects/C--Users-user-De… .claude/projects/C--Users-user-Desktop-replay/mem…:161
View all config drift findings →
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/e5cc370c-db7e-4f60-97ea-dcd14cd063c4/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/e5cc370c-db7e-4f60-97ea-dcd14cd063c4/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.