Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

harehare/mq

https://github.com/harehare/mq · scanned 2026-05-15 12:20 UTC (2 weeks, 6 days ago) · 10 languages

73 findings (17 legacy + 56 scanner) 15th percentile · Rust · large (100-500K LoC) Scanner says 78 (lower by 15)

File as issue Image v2 schema
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 weeks, 6 days ago · v1 · 16 findings from 1 source. Findings combine the legacy security pipeline AND the multi-layer engine (atlas, wiring, flows, ranked) AND verified AI agent contributions.

JSON
Combined
73.5
/100
Repobility
69
16 legacy
9-layer
78
88.9% cov · 0 gaps
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
6
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Score breakdown â 2026-05-17-v4 calibration-aware
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 60.0 0.15 9.00
security_score 84.5 0.25 21.12
testing_score 30.0 0.20 6.00
documentation_score 75.0 0.15 11.25
practices_score 75.0 0.15 11.25
code_quality 40.7 0.10 4.07
Overall 1.00 62.7
Calibrated penalty buckets (security_score): agent: 5.4 · authz: 2.1 · docker: 4.0 · threat: 4.0
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 9 Medium 4 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Legacy 16 9-layer 0 Crowd 0 Layer: Security 4 Cicd 3 Quality 5 Software 4
Scan summary Repository scanned at 77.9/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 555 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 0 findings. Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium. Recommended next step: open the software layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 16 of 16 findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high Legacy security path_traversal conf 0.80 [SEC013] Path Traversal — User Input in File Path: User-controlled input used in file path without sanitization. Allows reading arbitrary files.
Use os.path.realpath() and verify the path starts with your expected base directory. Use secure_filename() for uploads.
crates/mq-lsp/src/server.rs:52 path_traversallegacy
medium Legacy security auth conf 0.92 [AUC001] No Repobility access matrix policy found: The repository uses web/API frameworks but does not define .repobility/access.yml or equivalent authorization documentation.
The repository uses web/API frameworks but does not define .repobility/access.yml or equivalent authorization documentation.
authlegacy
high Legacy security auth conf 0.74 [AUC002] Low visible authorization coverage in route inventory: Only 16.7% of discovered routes show nearby authentication, authorization, middleware, or public-route evidence.
Only 16.7% of discovered routes show nearby authentication, authorization, middleware, or public-route evidence.
authlegacy
medium Legacy quality quality Average file size is 606 lines (recommend <300)
Refactor large files by extracting related functions into separate modules. Target files with 300+ lines first. Use the Single Responsibility Principle — each module should have one clear purpose.
qualitylegacy
medium Legacy cicd docker conf 0.76 Dockerfile copies broad context with incomplete .dockerignore
COPY . or ADD . is safer when .dockerignore excludes secrets, git history, keys, and generated artifacts.
Dockerfile:5 dockerlegacy
medium Legacy cicd docker conf 0.90 Dockerfile installs dependencies after copying the full source tree
When dependency installation comes after COPY ., any source change invalidates the dependency layer and makes Docker rebuild much more slowly.
Dockerfile:7 dockerlegacy
high Legacy quality quality conf 0.86 Duplicated implementation block across source files
Duplicated blocks are a common artifact when generated code is pasted or recreated instead of reused. They increase maintenance cost because every future bug fix must be found in multiple locations.
crates/mq-wasm/src/script.rs:471 qualitylegacy
high Legacy quality quality conf 0.86 Duplicated implementation block across source files
Duplicated blocks are a common artifact when generated code is pasted or recreated instead of reused. They increase maintenance cost because every future bug fix must be found in multiple locations.
crates/mq-run/src/debugger.rs:320 qualitylegacy
high Legacy quality quality conf 0.80 localStorage write failures are swallowed silently
localStorage quotas are small and writes can fail. Catching storage errors without a user-visible warning causes silent data loss when notes, images, or snapshots exceed quota.
packages/mq-playground/src/Playground.tsx:128 qualitylegacy
high Legacy software dependency conf 0.70 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell
Agent helper projects often publish one-line installers. `curl | sh` style commands are convenient, but they bypass review unless the script is pinned, signed, or checksum-verified.
editors/neovim/README.md:383 dependencylegacy
high Legacy software dependency conf 0.70 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell
Agent helper projects often publish one-line installers. `curl | sh` style commands are convenient, but they bypass review unless the script is pinned, signed, or checksum-verified.
docs/books/src/start/tui.md:8 dependencylegacy
high Legacy software dependency conf 0.70 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell
Agent helper projects often publish one-line installers. `curl | sh` style commands are convenient, but they bypass review unless the script is pinned, signed, or checksum-verified.
docs/books/src/start/debugger.md:12 dependencylegacy
high Legacy software dependency conf 0.70 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell
Agent helper projects often publish one-line installers. `curl | sh` style commands are convenient, but they bypass review unless the script is pinned, signed, or checksum-verified.
README.md:58 dependencylegacy
low Legacy cicd docker conf 0.72 .dockerignore misses sensitive defaults
.dockerignore exists but does not cover common secret or VCS patterns.
.dockerignore dockerlegacy
low Legacy security auth conf 0.76 [AUC005] No authorization-focused tests detected: No test files with common authorization, ownership, 403, admin, or super_admin assertions were found.
No test files with common authorization, ownership, 403, admin, or super_admin assertions were found.
authlegacy
low Legacy quality quality conf 0.68 Multiple AI-agent scaffold marker files are present
Repositories with several agent instruction, progress, or completion marker files are often generated scaffolds. They are not automatically wrong, but they deserve a reachability and ownership review before users treat the code as production-ready.
.github/copilot-instructions.md:1 qualitylegacy
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/e6bb1e32-6148-4bc6-a416-5fb6543fa7c6/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/e6bb1e32-6148-4bc6-a416-5fb6543fa7c6/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.