Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io

https://github.com/TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io · scanned 2026-06-16 00:38 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

19 raw signals (8 security + 11 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 18 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 12 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

55.6% cov · 11 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 2 Medium 10 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 7 System graph 11 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 12 Security 4 Frontend 1 Cicd 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 95.1/100 with 55.6% coverage. It contains 109 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 11 findings — concentrated in quality (6), security (3), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 6 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 16 of 18 actionable findings. 30 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks security auth conf 0.78 Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io

Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails Query id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI. Motif: security_auth_without_guardrails Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold labe…

high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 3 occurrences Foundry mined bad chains: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io

Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io Thread: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io#4 Outcome: not_resolved_or_not_observed Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_without_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_h…

3 occurrences

repo-level (3 hits)

high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.80 2 occurrences Foundry mined docs only runtime fix: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io

Graph query export: Docs-only response to runtime or integration issue Query id: docs_only_runtime_fix Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check examples where docs or claims are not enough proof. Motif: docs_only_runtime_fix Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold label: assumption_chec…

2 occurrences

repo-level (2 hits)

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.62 3 occurrences Foundry mined assumption checks: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io

Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks Repo: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io Thread: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io#7 Outcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence Thread label: thread_needs_classification Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real…

3 occurrences

repo-level (3 hits)

medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 2 occurrences Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io

Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …

2 occurrences

repo-level (2 hits)

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.72 Foundry mined review feedback without structured fix: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io

Graph query export: Review feedback without structured fix chain Query id: review_feedback_without_structured_fix Query type: motif_query Intent: Weak-supervision examples for review comments lacking a traceable fix. Motif: review_feedback_without_structured_fix Training usage: weak_supervision Gra…

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.70 7 occurrences Foundry mined unresolved feedback: TingdeLiu/tingdeliu.github.io

Graph query export: Human feedback without linked fix evidence Query id: unresolved_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Negative/unresolved examples that should not be hallucinated into fixes. Motif: unlinked_feedback_needs_evidence Training usage: negative_or_unresolved Graph gold label: need…

7 occurrences

repo-level (7 hits)

medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests, operator-readme. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/simple-jekyll-search.js:372

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

js/simple-jekyll-search.js:372 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/simple-jekyll-search.min.js:6

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

js/simple-jekyll-search.min.js:6 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.

auth

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 3 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected

No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Docs conf 1.00 README lacks setup or run instructions

A README exists, but it does not contain common install/setup/run markers. This matches a frequent generated-code pattern: UI is present, operational handoff is thin.

ReadmeRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/e96e17ba-be3c-4f9e-b5ed-2eb10e9d0ae2/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/e96e17ba-be3c-4f9e-b5ed-2eb10e9d0ae2/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.