Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

zulandar/railyard

https://github.com/zulandar/railyard · scanned 2026-06-16 01:13 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

140 raw signals (68 security + 72 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 47 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 152 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
67.6
/100
Security checks
68
8 findings
System graph
68
100.0% cov · 39 findings
Critical
5
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 5 High 4 Medium 15 Low 19 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 8 System graph 39 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 28 Security 9 Software 3 Frontend 3 Cicd 4
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 67.6/100 with 100.0% coverage. It contains 1289 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 72 findings — concentrated in quality (38), cicd (19), security (9). Risk profile is high: 4 critical, 1 high, 24 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 42 of 47 actionable findings. 199 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks quality Practices conf 0.82 4 occurrences Foundry mined mock as real or placeholder: zulandar/railyard
Graph query export: Mock, sample, placeholder, or self-attested behavior treated as real Query id: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for fake completeness and missing real data paths. Motif: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Training usage: hard_negative Graph gol…
4 occurrences
repo-level (4 hits)
critical Security checks security auth conf 0.78 18 occurrences Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: zulandar/railyard
Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails Query id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI. Motif: security_auth_without_guardrails Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold labe…
18 occurrences
repo-level (18 hits)
critical System graph security Secrets conf 1.00 Possible secret in charts/railyard/README.md
Detected pattern matching generic_api_key. Rotate the credential and move to a secret manager.
charts/railyard/README.md:316
critical System graph security Secrets conf 1.00 Possible secret in pkg/cli/cocoindex.go
Detected pattern matching password_literal. Rotate the credential and move to a secret manager.
pkg/cli/cocoindex.go:72
high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 2 occurrences Foundry mined bad chains: zulandar/railyard
Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: zulandar/railyard Thread: zulandar/railyard#68 Outcome: claimed_resolved_unverified Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_has_ve…
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
high Security checks quality Quality conf 0.76 3 occurrences Foundry mined schema ui api mismatch: zulandar/railyard
Graph query export: Schema, UI, and API mismatch Query id: schema_ui_api_mismatch Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check examples for data-path consistency across layers. Motif: schema_ui_api_mismatch Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold label: supported_by_verification_signal Repo…
3 occurrences
repo-level (3 hits)
high Security checks quality Testing conf 0.78 25 occurrences Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: zulandar/railyard
Graph query export: Feedback exposes missing tests or CI Query id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails. Motif: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Training usage: hard_negative Graph gold label: supported_by_verificati…
25 occurrences
repo-level (25 hits)
high System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'new_function_used' in internal/dashboard/assets/htmx.min.js:1
Found a known-risky pattern (new_function_used). Review and replace if possible.
internal/dashboard/assets/htmx.min.js:1 New function used
medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.62 31 occurrences Foundry mined assumption checks: zulandar/railyard
Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks Repo: zulandar/railyard Thread: zulandar/railyard#8 Outcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_grap…
31 occurrences
repo-level (31 hits)
medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 42 occurrences Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: zulandar/railyard
Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …
42 occurrences
repo-level (42 hits)
medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.70 2 occurrences Foundry mined unresolved feedback: zulandar/railyard
Graph query export: Human feedback without linked fix evidence Query id: unresolved_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Negative/unresolved examples that should not be hallucinated into fixes. Motif: unlinked_feedback_needs_evidence Training usage: negative_or_unresolved Graph gold label: supp…
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 13 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
golangci/golangci-lint-action@v9 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
3 files, 13 locations
.github/workflows/docker.yml:44, 47, 57, 87, 90, 98, 107, 131 (8 hits)
.github/workflows/release.yml:27, 65, 85 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/ci.yml:59, 145 (2 hits)
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
.github/workflows/docker.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
.github/workflows/release.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in internal/dashboard/assets/htmx.min.js:1
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
internal/dashboard/assets/htmx.min.js:1 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in internal/dashboard/assets/sse.js:10
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
internal/dashboard/assets/sse.js:10 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'domparser_html_parse' in internal/dashboard/assets/htmx.min.js:1
Found a known-risky pattern (domparser_html_parse). Review and replace if possible.
internal/dashboard/assets/htmx.min.js:1 Domparser html parse
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'insert_adjacent_html' in internal/dashboard/assets/htmx.min.js:1
Found a known-risky pattern (insert_adjacent_html). Review and replace if possible.
internal/dashboard/assets/htmx.min.js:1 Insert adjacent html
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — cocoindex/overlay.py:49
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — cocoindex/overlay_integration_test.py:156
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — pkg/cli/cocoindex_overlay.py:49
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected
Found 242 placeholder/mock markers across 59 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.
Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 54 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 4 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
actions/upload-artifact@v6 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
2 files, 4 locations
.github/workflows/docker.yml:37, 79 (2 hits)
.github/workflows/release.yml:179, 194 (2 hits)
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 17 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: examples/plugins/python/plugin.py:StartStream, examples/plugins/python/plugin.py:Start This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
17 occurrences
repo-level (17 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: cocoindex/overlay_test.py:test_connects_with_database_url, cocoindex/overlay_test.py:test_connects_with_database_url, cocoindex/overlay_test.py:test_connects_with_database_url This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded rep…
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 2 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 4 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: cocoindex/auth_security_test.py:decorator, cocoindex/overlay_test.py:decorator, cocoindex/mcp_server_test.py:decorator, cocoindex/mcp_server_test.py:decorator This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://…
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: add_HostServiceServicer_to_server
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
examples/plugins/python/railyard_plugin/plugin_pb2_grpc.py:392
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: flow_def
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
cocoindex/main.py:122
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: flow_def
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
pkg/cli/cocoindex_main.py:95
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — internal/dashboard/assets/htmx.min.js:1
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — internal/dashboard/assets/sse.js:14
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Stub function `run` (body is just `pass`/`return`) — cocoindex/mcp_server_test.py:114
Likely an AI scaffold that was never filled in. Remove or implement.
Empty handlerDead code
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: internal/config/config_test.go (2969 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: internal/yardmaster/daemon.go (1680 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: internal/yardmaster/daemon_test.go (3579 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: internal/yardmaster/switch_test.go (2755 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: pkg/cli/init_test.go (2107 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: pkg/plugin/proto/v1/plugin.pb.go (4070 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: scripts/create_cars.sh (980 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/ebb6426d-ec66-4b73-9bc9-dd50160807a7/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/ebb6426d-ec66-4b73-9bc9-dd50160807a7/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.