CelestoAI/SmolVM

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

139 of your 203 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 1.44s · analysis 12.43s · 2.7 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/CelestoAI/SmolVM · scanned 2026-06-05 14:54 UTC (5 days, 4 hours ago) · 10 languages

513 raw signals (191 security + 322 graph) 68th percentile · Python · medium (20-100K LoC) System graph score 60 (higher by 13)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 4 hours ago · v2 · 214 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 113 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 116 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	85.0	0.15	12.75
`security_score`	45.4	0.25	11.35
`testing_score`	100.0	0.20	20.00
`documentation_score`	100.0	0.15	15.00
`practices_score`	74.0	0.15	11.10
`code_quality`	35.1	0.10	3.51
Overall		1.00	73.7

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 5 High 32 Medium 26 Low 83 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 98 System graph 116 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 118 Security 24 Cicd 7 Software 52 Frontend 3 Network 2 Api 8

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 3 findings

What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.

Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.

How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.

Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.

3 matching findings on this repo

low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 4 places repo-level

View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →

Legacy markers 3 findings

What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.

Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.

How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.

Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.

3 matching findings on this repo

low Old/deprecated-named symbol `test_sh_wrap_is_byte_identical_to_legacy` in tests…
medium Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — examples/cua/legacy_rep…
medium Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — examples/cua/legacy_rep…

View all legacy markers findings →

Commented-out code 21 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

12 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (7 lines) in tests/test_ssh.py:454
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/test_published_images.py:525
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/e2e/conftest.py:60
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in src/smolvm/vm.py:2199
info Commented-code block (8 lines) in src/smolvm/ssh.py:42
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in src/smolvm/facade.py:99
info Commented-code block (9 lines) in src/smolvm/presets/claude_code.py:22
info Commented-code block (9 lines) in src/smolvm/presets/pi.py:23
info Commented-code block (13 lines) in src/smolvm/presets/_git.py:49
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in src/smolvm/presets/_install.py:47
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in src/smolvm/host/doctor.py:534
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in src/smolvm/guest_agent/agent.py:229

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 3 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

3 matching findings on this repo

low File has no detected symbols: ui/vite.config.js
low File has no detected symbols: ui/tailwind.config.js
low File has no detected symbols: ui/postcss.config.js

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/f1293bd5-b6e8-4fcf-84d1-4baea17e58a3/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/f1293bd5-b6e8-4fcf-84d1-4baea17e58a3/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.