saleor/storefront

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

17 of your 114 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 1.64s · analysis 30.57s · 2.1 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/saleor/storefront · scanned 2026-06-05 12:47 UTC (1 week, 2 days ago) · 10 languages

262 raw signals (108 security + 154 graph) 18th percentile · Typescript · medium (20-100K LoC) System graph score 75 (lower by 23)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 week, 2 days ago · v2 · 156 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 28 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 76 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	85.0	0.15	12.75
`security_score`	19.8	0.25	4.95
`testing_score`	30.0	0.20	6.00
`documentation_score`	65.7	0.15	9.86
`practices_score`	77.0	0.15	11.55
`code_quality`	68.4	0.10	6.84
Overall		1.00	51.9

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: severity: low × excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 2 High 46 Medium 28 Low 64 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 80 System graph 76 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 20 Security 17 Software 99 Cicd 4 Api 1 Frontend 13 Hardware 2

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Scan summary Quality grade C- (52/100). Dimensions: security 20, maintainability 85. 108 findings (44 security). 26,253 lines analyzed.

Showing 64 of 156 actionable findings. 184 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

low Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.72 .dockerignore misses sensitive defaults

.dockerignore exists but does not cover common secret or VCS patterns.

.dockerignore CI/CD securitycontainers

low Security checks security auth conf 0.76 [AUC005] No authorization-focused tests detected: No test files with common authorization, ownership, 403, admin, or super_admin assertions were found.

No test files with common authorization, ownership, 403, admin, or super_admin assertions were found.

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.60 18 occurrences Duplicated implementation block across source files

Duplicate implementation blocks are maintenance debt. Keep them visible, but they are not a high-severity defect unless the duplicated logic is security-sensitive or drifting.

12 files, 13 locations

src/ui/components/sign-up-form.tsx:27, 156 (2 hits)

src/_reference/checkout-sections/PaymentSection/AdyenDropIn/types.ts:24

src/app/[channel]/(main)/collections/[slug]/client.tsx:6

src/app/[channel]/(main)/collections/[slug]/page.tsx:12

src/app/[channel]/(main)/products/products-client.tsx:64

src/checkout/components/shipping-address/hybrid-address-selector.tsx:47

src/checkout/graphql/codegen.ts:27

src/checkout/views/page-not-found/page-not-found.tsx:14

duplicationquality

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.64 Public docs site has no llms.txt

AI coding agents increasingly read llms.txt to find canonical docs and API workflows. Without it, agents are more likely to browse pages repeatedly or use stale instructions.

llms.txt

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.50 Public web app has no humans.txt

humans.txt is optional, but it gives operators and reviewers a simple place to find ownership, contact, and important public documentation links.

humans.txt

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.74 Public web app has no robots.txt

Public websites should publish a robots.txt file so crawlers and AI agents can discover crawl rules and sitemap locations without guessing.

robots.txt

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.72 Public web app has no sitemap

A sitemap gives search engines, docs crawlers, and AI agents a structured list of public pages. Without one, important docs and product pages are easy to miss.

sitemap.xml

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 14 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example

Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `DEBUG_CACHE`, `GITHUB_ACTION`, `NEXT_BUILD_RETRIES`, `NEXT_OUTPUT`, `NEXT_PUBLIC_VERCEL_URL`, `NODE_ENV`, `REVALIDATE_SECRET`, `SALEOR_APP_TOKEN` + 6 more. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboarding doesn't break.

config drift

low System graph hardware Coverage conf 1.00 Containers defined but no K8s/orchestration manifest found

Repo has Dockerfiles/compose but no Kubernetes/Nomad manifests. If the target deployment is K8s, the manifests may live in a separate ops repo.

Deployment

low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: node:20-alpine

Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.

Dockerfile:1 containersPinned dependencies

low System graph software Dead code candidate conf 1.00 File has no detected symbols: .graphqlrc.ts