Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

tcconnally/perseus-qwen-memory

https://github.com/tcconnally/perseus-qwen-memory · scanned 2026-06-16 00:30 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

12 raw signals (0 security + 12 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 12 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 12 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 5 Low 5 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 12 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 1 Security 3 Cicd 1 Quality 7

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 81.7/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 103 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 12 findings — concentrated in quality (7), security (3), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 5 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 10 of 12 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: AGENTS.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

AGENTS.md VerificationAgents md

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in demo/demo_terminal.html:193

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

demo/demo_terminal.html:193 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in demo/proof_terminal.html:155

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

demo/proof_terminal.html:155 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — demo/record_proof.py:66

`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.

auth

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 12 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example

Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `AUTO_REFLECT`, `CONFIDENCE_DECAY_RATE`, `ELASTIC_API_KEY`, `ELASTIC_CLOUD_ID`, `ELASTIC_MEMORY_INDEX`, `ENGRAM_BIN`, `ENGRAM_DB_PATH`, `LLM_BASE_URL` + 4 more. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboarding doesn't break.

config drift

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 68 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

actions/setup-python@v5 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

.github/workflows/pr-pilot.yml:38 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `days_old` in tests/test_memory_agent.py:98

Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.

old markerDead code

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/f3c238a5-12ca-4887-b6fc-10983c7379ba/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/f3c238a5-12ca-4887-b6fc-10983c7379ba/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.