Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
12 of your 24 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.
Upstream (GitHub) caused delay on this scan — not Repobility.
  • GitHub API rate-limited (HTTP 403) — preflight skipped, fell back to direct git clone.
  • Clone from GitHub took 73.11s for a 76.3 MB repo slow.
  • Repobility's analysis ran in 0.45s after the clone landed.

shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice

https://github.com/shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice · scanned 2026-06-05 10:02 UTC (5 days, 14 hours ago) · 10 languages

29 raw signals (21 security + 8 graph) 11/13 scanners ran 81st percentile · Python · tiny (<2K LoC) System graph score 99 (lower by 25)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 14 hours ago · v2 · 16 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 9 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 30.0 0.15 4.50
security_score 100.0 0.25 25.00
testing_score 70.0 0.20 14.00
documentation_score 85.0 0.15 12.75
practices_score 70.0 0.15 10.50
code_quality 70.0 0.10 7.00
Overall 1.00 73.8
security_score may be inflated — optional security scanners were skipped on this fast scan
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Scan summary Quality grade B (74/100). Dimensions: security 100, maintainability 30. 21 findings. 852 lines analyzed.

Showing 9 of 16 actionable findings. 25 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

low Security checks quality Error handling conf 1.00 [ERR001] Silent Exception Swallowing: Silently swallowing all exceptions hides bugs. Even in cleanup code, log at DEBUG level.
Log the error: `except Exception: logger.debug('cleanup failed', exc_info=True)`. Or handle specific exception types.
.codex/hooks/scripts/hooks.py:182
low Security checks quality Quality conf 1.00 [SEC136] AI-typical over-broad exception handler swallowing all errors: Catch-all exception block that silently returns success or no-ops. AI agents reach for this pattern when a flaky test or an unfamiliar API throws — wrap, swallow, return success. Real bugs are masked, observability is destroyed, and callers think the operation worked. CWE-396 (improperly-generalized exception). Distinct from intentional fallback because there's no log line and the success value is fabricated.
Catch the specific exception type, log at error level with full exception info, and return a failure-shaped result. If the operation is genuinely best-effort, log at warning and document why in a comment so the next reader (or scanner) knows.
.codex/hooks/scripts/hooks.py:179
medium Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.68 Agent auto-approve or skip-permissions mode is easy to enable
Require an explicit isolated profile for auto-approve modes. Keep safe defaults interactive, add visible warnings, and block these modes when the workspace contains secrets or production deploy credentials.
best-practice/claude-settings.md:258 CI/CD securityagent runtimepermissions
medium Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.68 Agent auto-approve or skip-permissions mode is easy to enable
Require an explicit isolated profile for auto-approve modes. Keep safe defaults interactive, add visible warnings, and block these modes when the workspace contains secrets or production deploy credentials.
best-practice/claude-cli-startup-flags.md:66 CI/CD securityagent runtimepermissions
low Security checks quality Error handling conf 0.55 ✓ Repobility 10 occurrences Broad exception handler needs review
This handler catches Exception/BaseException. It is actionable when it swallows errors without logging, re-raising, or returning a structured error. Handlers that intentionally convert exceptions into typed error results should not be treated as high risk.
2 files, 10 locations
.claude/hooks/scripts/hooks.py:198, 240, 249, 261, 289, 298, 476 (7 hits)
.codex/hooks/scripts/hooks.py:154, 194, 362 (3 hits)
Error handlingquality
medium Security checks quality Quality conf 0.73 Codex session log reader may expose prompts or tool-call content
Parse only usage metadata by default. Redact prompts, tool arguments, file paths, and message content before storage, telemetry, export, screenshots, or support bundles.
.codex/hooks/scripts/hooks.py:3
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.
auth
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.60 Duplicated implementation block across source files
Duplicate implementation blocks are maintenance debt. Keep them visible, but they are not a high-severity defect unless the duplicated logic is security-sensitive or drifting.
.codex/hooks/scripts/hooks.py:47 duplicationquality
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/f3ffbfa1-6fa6-4fe1-aa03-f6299d72308b/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/f3ffbfa1-6fa6-4fe1-aa03-f6299d72308b/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.