Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

susumutomita/TenkaCloud

https://github.com/susumutomita/TenkaCloud · scanned 2026-06-16 04:39 UTC (1 month, 3 weeks ago)

5 raw signals (0 security + 5 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 5 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

55.6% cov · 5 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 3 Low 2 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 5 Crowd 0 Layer: Security 2 Cicd 1 Quality 2

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 72.4/100 with 55.6% coverage. It contains 25 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 5 findings — concentrated in security (2), quality (2), cicd (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 3 medium. Recommended next step: open the security layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 5 of 5 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph security Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instruction contains unpinned remote install: AGENTS.md

Remote install commands in agent instructions are a supply-chain risk, especially when an agent can execute shell commands.

AGENTS.md:126 Supply chainAgents md

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing ci. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'dangerous_innerhtml' in CLAUDE.md:186

Found a known-risky pattern (dangerous_innerhtml). Review and replace if possible.

CLAUDE.md:186 Dangerous innerhtml

low System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Multiple root agent instruction files without precedence

The repo has multiple top-level AI-coder instruction files. Without precedence rules, different agents may follow different policies.

Governance

low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 package.json defines install-time lifecycle scripts

preinstall/install/postinstall/prepare scripts execute during dependency installation. Review them carefully for network calls, obfuscation, shell execution, or credential access.

package.json CI/CD securitySupply chainNpm

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/f7352342-20c1-4663-8aa7-c8624190cfb0/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/f7352342-20c1-4663-8aa7-c8624190cfb0/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.