Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

wangtao9090/VibeCAD

https://github.com/wangtao9090/VibeCAD · scanned 2026-06-16 00:54 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

20 raw signals (9 security + 11 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 17 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 20 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 11 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 2 Medium 6 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 6 System graph 11 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 14 Frontend 1 Security 1 Cicd 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 95.6/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 846 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 11 findings — concentrated in quality (8), frontend (1), security (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 3 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 12 of 17 actionable findings. 37 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks quality Practices conf 0.82 3 occurrences Foundry mined mock as real or placeholder: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Graph query export: Mock, sample, placeholder, or self-attested behavior treated as real Query id: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for fake completeness and missing real data paths. Motif: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Training usage: hard_negative Graph gol…

3 occurrences

repo-level (3 hits)

high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 4 occurrences Foundry mined bad chains: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: wangtao9090/VibeCAD Thread: wangtao9090/VibeCAD#9 Outcome: not_resolved_or_not_observed Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_without_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, l…

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

high Security checks quality Testing conf 0.78 4 occurrences Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Graph query export: Feedback exposes missing tests or CI Query id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails. Motif: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Training usage: hard_negative Graph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_…

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.62 5 occurrences Foundry mined assumption checks: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks Repo: wangtao9090/VibeCAD Thread: wangtao9090/VibeCAD#6 Outcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_artifact…

5 occurrences

repo-level (5 hits)

medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 4 occurrences Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.70 6 occurrences Foundry mined unresolved feedback: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Graph query export: Human feedback without linked fix evidence Query id: unresolved_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Negative/unresolved examples that should not be hallucinated into fixes. Motif: unlinked_feedback_needs_evidence Training usage: negative_or_unresolved Graph gold label: need…

6 occurrences

repo-level (6 hits)

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

.github/workflows/release.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — src/vibecad/runtime/micromamba.py:33

`urllib.request.urlopen(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.

auth

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: src/vibecad/runtime/paths.py:env_python_for, src/vibecad/runtime/paths.py:env_python This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/test_tools_features.py (1752 lines)

Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/ae767be6-5268-4a16-89f0-fdb2168ab330/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/ae767be6-5268-4a16-89f0-fdb2168ab330/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.