Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

Robbyant/lingbot-map

https://github.com/Robbyant/lingbot-map · scanned 2026-07-23 19:43 UTC (4 days, 21 hours ago)

45 raw signals (0 security + 45 graph)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 21 hours ago · v7 · last Δ +0.1 (diff) · 45 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 2 findings
What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.
Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.
How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.
Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.
2 matching findings on this repo
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places
View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →
Legacy markers 1 finding
What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.
Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.
How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.
Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.
1 matching finding on this repo
  • low Old/deprecated-named symbol `has_color_legacy` in benchmark/benchmark/io/pointc…
View all legacy markers findings →
Commented-out code 3 findings
What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.
Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.
How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.
Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.
3 matching findings on this repo
  • info Commented-code block (6 lines) in lingbot_map/layers/swiglu_ffn.py:42 lingbot_map/layers/swiglu_ffn.py:42
  • info Commented-code block (6 lines) in benchmark/datasets/neural_rgbd.py:329 benchmark/datasets/neural_rgbd.py:329
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in benchmark/benchmark/geometry/projection.py:62 benchmark/benchmark/geometry/projection.py:62
View all commented-out code findings →
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/89c3b952-6e0f-4bdf-a892-b7f16486dce7/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/89c3b952-6e0f-4bdf-a892-b7f16486dce7/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.